D1.2 — Bit Definition

Chain Position: 5 of 188

Assumes

A1.1 (Existence) - Something must exist to be distinguished
A1.2 (Distinction) - Binary distinction is the minimal case of distinction
A1.3 (Information Primacy) - The bit is the atomic unit of primitive information
D1.1 (Information Definition) - The bit is the minimal unit of uncertainty reduction

Formal Statement

Bit = minimal unit of distinction (binary choice)

Spine type: Definition
Spine stage: 1

Spine Master mappings:

Physics mapping: Observables / Contrast
Theology mapping: Genesis 1 ordering
Consciousness mapping: Qualia
Quantum mapping: Quantum distinguishability
Scripture mapping: Genesis 1:4 light/dark
Evidence mapping: QM experiments
Information mapping: Distinction as bit

Cross-domain (Spine Master):

Statement: Bit = minimal unit of distinction (binary choice)
Stage: 1
Physics: Observables / Contrast
Theology: Genesis 1 ordering
Consciousness: Qualia
Quantum: Quantum distinguishability
Scripture: Genesis 1:4 light/dark
Evidence: QM experiments
Information: Distinction as bit
Bridge Count: 7

Enables

LN1.1 (Matter-Energy Derivative) - Matter/energy decompose into bit-patterns
LN1.2 (It-From-Bit) - Wheeler’s doctrine formalizes bit-to-physics correspondence
A5.1 (Observation Requirement) - Observation extracts bits from superposition
A6.1 (Superposition) - Qubits are superpositions of bits
D4.1 (Kolmogorov Complexity) - K(x) counts bits in minimal description
All entropy calculations (Shannon, von Neumann, Bekenstein-Hawking)

Defeat Conditions

To falsify this definition, one would need to:

Demonstrate a unit of information smaller than a binary choice
Show that binary distinction is not the minimal case of A1.2
Prove that continuous information (nats) is more fundamental than discrete (bits)

Physical grounding:

Bekenstein bound: S ≤ 2πkER/(ħc) — maximum bits in a region is finite
Planck-scale discretization suggests bits are fundamental
Quantum mechanics: measurement yields discrete outcomes (eigenvalues)
Landauer’s principle: bit erasure costs kT ln(2) energy

Note: Bits and nats are interconvertible (1 nat = log₂(e) bits). The choice of base is convention; the discreteness of the minimal unit is the substantive claim.

Standard Objections

Objection 1: Continuous Information

“Real numbers contain infinite information. Information isn’t discrete.”

Response: The Bekenstein bound proves otherwise—finite regions contain finite bits. “Infinite precision” real numbers are mathematical abstractions, not physical realities. Every measurement has finite precision. The universe is quantized at Planck scale. Continuous descriptions are approximations to underlying discrete structure.

Objection 2: Qubits Aren’t Binary

“A qubit can be in superposition—not just 0 or 1”

Response: Correct, but measurement of a qubit yields exactly one bit. The superposition |0⟩ + |1⟩ collapses to |0⟩ or |1⟩ upon observation (A6.1-A6.2). The bit is the output of quantum measurement. Qubits extend the bit; they don’t replace it.

Objection 3: Trits and Higher Bases

“Why not ternary? Why binary?”

Response: Any base-n digit is reducible to ⌈log₂(n)⌉ bits. The bit is minimal because 2 is the smallest integer > 1. Distinction itself (A1.2) is inherently binary: X or not-X. The bit captures this logical minimality.

Defense Summary

The bit is logically minimal (binary choice = simplest distinction) and physically fundamental (Bekenstein bound, Landauer principle, quantum measurement outcomes). All proposed alternatives either:

Reduce to bits (trits = multiple bits)
Are approximations (continuous variables)
Confirm bits as the measurement output (qubits)

Genesis 1:4 — “God separated the light from the darkness” — is the first recorded bit: the primordial distinction.

Physics Layer

Planck-Scale Discretization

Natural units suggest fundamental discreteness:

Planck length: ℓ_P = √(ħG/c³) ≈ 1.6 × 10⁻³⁵ m
Planck time: t_P = ℓ_P/c ≈ 5.4 × 10⁻⁴⁴ s
Planck area: A_P = ℓ_P² ≈ 2.6 × 10⁻⁶⁰ m²

Bekenstein bound implies discrete information: $N_{bi t s} \leq \frac{2 π RE}{ℏ c l n 2} = \frac{A}{4 ℓ _{P}^{2} l n 2}$ Maximum bits in a sphere = area/(4 Planck areas). Information is counted in BITS, not continuous quantities.

Quantum Measurement

Measurement outcomes are discrete eigenvalues: For any observable A with spectrum {a_i}:

Pre-measurement: |ψ⟩ = Σ c_i |a_i⟩ (superposition)
Post-measurement: |a_k⟩ (definite eigenstate)
Output: eigenvalue a_k ∈ {a_i}

Spin-1/2 as canonical bit:

σ_z|+⟩ = +|+⟩, σ_z|-⟩ = -|-⟩
Measurement yields +ħ/2 or -ħ/2
This IS a physical bit: two distinguishable outcomes

Stern-Gerlach experiment (1922): Silver atoms split into exactly two beams. Physical reality gives discrete answers to yes/no questions.

Digital Physics

Lloyd’s computational universe (2002): The universe is a quantum computer. Its operations count:

Total ops since Big Bang: ~10¹²²
Total bits stored: ~10⁹²
Both are finite, counted in bits

Cellular automata (Wolfram, Zuse): Discrete update rules can generate complex physics. The bit is the natural unit for such systems.

Landauer’s Principle Revisited

Physical cost per bit: $E_{min} = k_{B} T ln 2 \approx 3 \times 1 0^{- 21} J at 300K$

Experimental confirmation (Bérut et al. 2012):

Measured energy dissipation during single-bit erasure
Matched Landauer bound within experimental error
The BIT is the unit of physical information processing

Connection to χ-Field

The χ-field’s information content is measured in bits:

S_χ = N_bits (integer count)
Coherence metrics count distinguishable configurations
Kolmogorov complexity K(χ) = bits in shortest description
The Master Equation’s integral discretizes to bit-counting at Planck scale

Mathematical Layer

Binary Representation Theorem

Any integer n ≥ 0 has unique binary representation: $n = \sum_{i = 0}^{k} b_{i} 2^{i}, b_{i} \in {0, 1}$

Bit depth: ⌈log₂(n+1)⌉ bits encode integers 0 to n.

Extension to reals: Binary expansion x = Σ b_i 2^(-i) (may be infinite). Computable reals have finite K-complexity descriptions.

Information Measures in Bits

Shannon entropy in bits: $H (X) = - \sum_{x} p (x) lo g_{2} p (x) bits$

Conversion: 1 nat = log₂(e) ≈ 1.443 bits; 1 dit = log₂(10) ≈ 3.322 bits

Binary is minimal: log₂(n) ≤ log_b(n) for b > 2. Binary achieves the lowest representation complexity.

Boolean Algebra

The bit generates Boolean algebra:

Domain: {0, 1}
Operations: AND (∧), OR (∨), NOT (¬), XOR (⊕)
Complete: any Boolean function f: {0,1}ⁿ → {0,1} has AND/OR/NOT expression

Universal gates: NAND or NOR alone can compute any Boolean function. The bit is computationally complete.

Quantum Extension: The Qubit

Qubit state: $∣ ψ ⟩ = α ∣0 ⟩ + β ∣1 ⟩, ∣ α ∣^{2} + ∣ β ∣^{2} = 1$

Bloch sphere: Qubit state space = S² (2-sphere). Continuous superposition, but:

Measurement yields 0 or 1 (one bit)
Superdense coding: 2 classical bits per qubit (with entanglement)
Holevo bound: ≤ 1 classical bit per qubit without entanglement

The bit is the OUTPUT of quantum measurement. Qubits extend bits; they don’t replace them.

Complexity Classes

Bits define computational complexity:

P: decidable in poly(n) time on n-bit input
NP: verifiable in poly(n) time
BQP: quantum computers in poly(n)

Church-Turing thesis: All computable functions are computable by Turing machines operating on bits. The bit is computationally universal.

Base Conversion

Any base b > 1 is reducible to bits:

One base-b digit = ⌈log₂(b)⌉ bits
Example: 1 byte = 8 bits = 2 hex digits

Why binary is privileged:

Minimal base (b=2) → simplest hardware
Boolean logic is naturally binary
Distinction itself is binary (A vs. not-A)

Collapse Analysis

If D1.2 fails:

No minimal unit for information → information becomes unmeasurable
Shannon entropy H(X) loses operational meaning (can’t count bits)
Kolmogorov complexity K(x) has no unit
Wheeler’s “It from Bit” has no “Bit” → LN1.2 collapses
Holographic principle (bits per Planck area) becomes meaningless
Quantum computing theory (qubit = superposition of bit) loses foundation

Collapse radius: CRITICAL - The bit is the atomic unit of the entire information-theoretic framework

Source Material

01_Axioms/_sources/Theophysics_Axiom_Spine_Master.xlsx (sheets explained in dump)
01_Axioms/AXIOM_AGGREGATION_DUMP.md

Category: Information_Theory/|Information Theory

Depends On:

[Information Theory](./001_A1.1_Existence]]
002_A1.2_Distinction
003_A1.3_Information-Primacy
004_D1.1_Information-Definition

Enables:

Related Categories:

[Information_Theory/.md)

[_WORKING_PAPERS/_MASTER_INDEX|← Back to Master Index

The 188 Axioms of Theophysics

Explorer

005_D1.2_Bit-Definition