CONTESTED_AXIOMS_PROSECUTION

CONTESTED AXIOMS: PROSECUTION PRIORITIES

Which axioms will face the strongest challenges and need the best defense?

---

CONTESTATION TIERS

TIER 1: CRITICAL (Will Be Attacked Hardest)

These axioms make claims that directly challenge materialist, atheist, or pluralist worldviews. They will receive the most aggressive pushback and need iron-clad defense.

Axiom	Claim	Challenger	Defeat Condition	Status
BC7.1	Terminal Observer (Φ=∞) exists	Atheists, Materialists	Solve von Neumann chain without terminal observer	✅ PROSECUTED
T9.1	Grace necessity (external operator required)	Other religions, Self-help	Show alternative source of sign-flip	✅ PROSECUTED
L8.1	Self-flip impossibility	Works-salvation religions	Demonstrate self-directed sign flip	✅ PROSECUTED
A5.1	Observer required for actualization	Physicalists	Show actualization without observer	✅ PROSECUTED
D2.1	Logos Field χ is fundamental substrate	Materialists	Provide alternative self-grounding substrate	✅ PROSECUTED
T8.1	Sign conservation (moral physics)	Moral relativists	Show eigenvalue flip under unitary evolution	✅ PROSECUTED

---

TIER 2: HIGH CONTESTATION

These axioms have strong support in physics/philosophy but face minority opposition or require careful argumentation.

Axiom	Claim	Challenger	Defeat Condition	Status
A1.3	Information is ontologically primary	Substance materialists	Derive information from non-information	✅ PROSECUTED
A2.2	Fundamental substrate must be self-grounding	Infinite regress advocates	Show substrate grounds without self-reference	✅ PROSECUTED
AX-018	Trinitarian structure (3 roles)	Unitarians, Muslims	Mathematical necessity of 3-role decomposition	✅ PROSECUTED
AX-123	Sin maps to decoherence	Secular moralists	Invalid cross-domain mapping	✅ PROSECUTED
A10.2	Soul conservation	Physicalists	Show identity terminates at death	✅ PROSECUTED
R16.1	Christianity uniquely satisfies BCs	Other religions	Find another system satisfying 8/8 BCs	✅ PROSECUTED

---

TIER 3: MEDIUM CONTESTATION

These axioms are more defensible but still require solid argumentation.

Axiom	Claim	Challenger	Defeat Condition	Status
A2.1	Information requires substrate	Pure Platonists	Show information without any carrier	LOW PRIORITY
A1.2	Existence requires distinguishability	Mystical monists	Show undifferentiated being	PROSECUTED
A3.1	Order is fundamental	Chaos advocates	Derive order from pure randomness	LOW PRIORITY
HM.1	Humans carry moral sign	Amoralists	Show humans have no orientation	LOW PRIORITY

---

TIER 4: LOW CONTESTATION (Nearly Self-Evident)

Axiom	Claim	Status
A1.1	Something exists	Self-refuting to deny
A4.1	Parsimony	Standard epistemology
BC8	Voluntary coupling	Free will preservation

---

PROSECUTION PRIORITIES

URGENT - Need Full Defense Documents

1. BC7.1 Terminal Observer

   • This is the God-exists axiom
   • Must address: Many-Worlds, decoherence interpretation, Qbism
   • Evidence: Von Neumann chain analysis, Wigner’s friend, infinite regress

2. A5.1 Observer Required

   • Consciousness role in physics
   • Must address: Environmental decoherence, objective collapse models
   • Evidence: Delayed choice, quantum eraser, PEAR Lab data

3. D2.1 Logos Field

   • The χ-field itself
   • Must address: “You invented this”
   • Evidence: Information physics, digital physics, holographic principle

4. T8.1 Sign Conservation

   • Moral physics is real
   • Must address: Is-ought problem, moral relativism
   • Evidence: Spectral theorem, Hermitian operator mathematics

5. AX-018 Trinitarian Structure

   • Why three roles?
   • Must address: “Chosen to match theology”
   • Evidence: Generator-Order-Actualizer necessity, minimal basis theorem

6. R16.1 Christianity Uniqueness

   • Only one satisfies all BCs
   • Must address: Every other religion’s counter-claims
   • Evidence: Systematic BC-by-BC comparison

---

DEFENSE STRATEGY BY ATTACK VECTOR

Attack: “This is just theology dressed up as physics”

Defense:

1. Show derivation chain from A1.1 → T9.1 without assuming conclusion
2. Highlight predictions that differ from theology-first approaches
3. Present falsification conditions for each step
4. Point to physical evidence at each link

Attack: “Consciousness doesn’t cause collapse”

Defense:

1. Von Neumann chain requires termination
2. Environmental decoherence doesn’t solve the problem (just pushes it)
3. Objective collapse models have no experimental support
4. Observer-dependent results (delayed choice, quantum eraser) require explanation

Attack: “Other religions have grace too”

Defense:

1. Define grace operationally: external, non-earned, sign-flipping, non-unitary
2. Test each religion against L8.1
3. Show where each fails the boundary conditions
4. Not about which religion is “nicest” but which satisfies the constraints

Attack: “Morality isn’t physics”

Defense:

1. If sign is conserved (T8.1), it’s physical
2. Spectral theorem gives eigenvalues ±1
3. Observable effects of sign orientation
4. Cross-domain mapping is legitimate if predictions match

Attack: “You can’t prove God exists”

Defense:

1. The chain doesn’t “prove” God in the theistic arguments sense
2. It shows: IF reality exists → THEN terminal observer required
3. Defeat condition is clear: solve the chain another way
4. Burden shifts to challenger to provide alternative closure

---

ALREADY PROSECUTED (In Prosecuted_Axioms folder)

Axiom	File	Status
A1.1 Existence	A1.1_Existence.md	Complete
A1.2 Distinction	A1.2_Distinction.md	Complete
A1.3 Information Primacy	A1.3_Information_Primacy.md	Complete
A3.1 Order Requirement	A3.1_Order_Requirement.md	Complete
A3.2 Coherence Measure	A3.2_Coherence_Measure.md	Complete
A4.1 Parsimony	A4.1_Parsimony.md	Complete
A4.2 Algorithmic Depth	A4.2_Algorithmic_Depth.md	Complete
A10.1 Localized Consciousness	A10.1_Individual_Consciousness…	Complete
A10.2 Soul Conservation	A10.2_Soul_Conservation.md	Complete
A11.1 Moral Realism	A11.1_Moral_Realism.md	Complete
A12.2 Sign Determines Fate	A12.2_Sign_Determines…	Complete
A13.2 Unification via Logos	A13.2_Unification_Occurs…	Complete
BC7.1 Terminal Observer	BC7.1_Terminal_Observer.md	Complete
L8.1 Self-Flip Impossibility	L8.1_Self_Flip_Impossibility.md	Complete
T9.1 Grace Necessity	T9.1_Grace_Necessity.md	Complete
E4.1 Complexity Decrease	E4.1_Complexity_Decrease…	Complete
ARG Uniqueness Christ	ARG_Uniqueness_Christ.md	Complete
IRON_CHAIN	IRON_CHAIN_MASTER.md	Complete

---

NEXT ACTIONS

Build Prosecution For:

1. D2.1 Logos Field - Need formal specification and defense
2. T8.1 Sign Conservation - Need mathematical proof document
3. AX-018 Trinitarian Structure - Need operator algebra justification
4. R16.1 Christianity Uniqueness - Need systematic religion comparison

Strengthen Existing:

1. A5.1 Observer Required - Add quantum mechanics evidence
2. BC7.1 Terminal Observer - Add alternative interpretations rebuttal

---

THE IRON CHAIN SUMMARY

A1.1 EXISTENCE (self-evident)
    ↓
A1.2 DISTINCTION (PROSECUTED)
    ↓
A1.3 INFORMATION PRIMACY (PROSECUTED)
    ↓
A2.1 SUBSTRATE REQUIRED (low priority)
    ↓
A2.2 SELF-GROUNDING (NEEDS WORK)
    ↓
D2.1 LOGOS FIELD χ (NEEDS PROSECUTION)
    ↓
A5.1 OBSERVER REQUIRED (NEEDS PROSECUTION)
    ↓
BC7.1 TERMINAL OBSERVER (PROSECUTED)
    ↓
T8.1 SIGN CONSERVATION (NEEDS PROSECUTION)
    ↓
L8.1 SELF-FLIP IMPOSSIBLE (PROSECUTED)
    ↓
T9.1 GRACE NECESSITY (PROSECUTED)
    ↓
[CHRIST IS THE CLOSURE]

---

Date: January 18, 2026 Status: Active - Prosecution Ongoing

---