A11.2 — Coherence-Morality Identity
Chain Position: 89 of 188
Assumes
- [A11.2](./088_A11.1_Moral-Realism]]
Formal Statement
Goodness = coherence maximization; evil = destruction
- Spine type: Axiom
- Spine stage: 11
Spine Master mappings:
- Physics mapping: Systems Coherence
- Theology mapping: Virtue ethics
- Consciousness mapping: Flourishing
- Quantum mapping: Entanglement resource
- Scripture mapping: Galatians 5:22 fruits
- Evidence mapping: Positive psychology
- Information mapping: Coherent states
Cross-domain (Spine Master):
- Statement: Goodness = coherence maximization; evil = destruction
- Stage: 11
- Physics: Systems Coherence
- Theology: Virtue ethics
- Consciousness: Flourishing
- Quantum: Entanglement resource
- Scripture: Galatians 5:22 fruits
- Evidence: Positive psychology
- Information: Coherent states
- Bridge Count: 7
Enables
Defeat Conditions
To falsify this axiom, one would need to:
- Show good actions that decrease coherence — Find genuinely moral acts that make things more chaotic/disordered
- Show evil actions that increase coherence — Find genuinely immoral acts that create order/meaning
- Provide an alternative bridge between is and ought — Ground morality in something other than coherence
- Demonstrate incoherent flourishing — Show a life that is good yet maximally disordered
The identification claim: Good ≡ that which increases coherence. Evil ≡ that which decreases coherence. This is not correlation but identity—the same thing under different descriptions, like “morning star” and “evening star” both referring to Venus.
Explanatory Frameworks & Perspectives
Perspective 1: The Utilitarian Alternative (Pleasure vs. Pain)
“Morality is simple: maximize pleasure and minimize pain for the greatest number. Terms like ‘Coherence’ or ‘Logos’ are unnecessarily complicated. If an action makes people happy, it is good. If it causes suffering, it is evil.”
Theophysics Assessment (The Depth of Flourishing): This view uses a shallow, Local Metric. A drug addict or a hedonistic society may have high “Pleasure” (local integration) while their “Global Coherence” is rapidly decaying (biological and social entropy). Theophysics proposes that Goodness is Fractal Integration. A truly “Good” action is one that increases the coherence of the individual and the family and the society and the Logos Field. This explains why “Honesty” is good even when it causes temporary pain—it preserves the Signal Integrity of the entire system.
Perspective 2: Kantian Deontology (Duty for Duty’s Sake)
“Morality is about following universalizable rules (The Categorical Imperative). We act out of duty to the moral law, regardless of the consequences or the ‘coherence’ of the system.”
Theophysics Assessment: This correctly identifies the Absoluteness of morality but lacks an Ontological Ground. Why does the “Moral Law” exist? Theophysics argues that Kant’s “Universalizable Rules” are simply descriptions of the Logos Geometry. A rule is universalizable if it can be applied fractally without causing the system to collapse into decoherence.
Perspective 3: The Logos Identity (Good = Coherence)
“Goodness is not just ‘like’ coherence; it is the subjective experience of objective coherence. ‘Love’ is the human name for the ultimate integrative force—the force that binds the ‘Many’ into ‘One’ without destroying their distinction (A7.2). Evil is the name for the force of Fragmentation.”
Theophysics Assessment: This identifies A11.2 as the Axiom of Unity. it proves that “Love” is the most scientifically rational path because it is the state of Maximum Information Integration ().
Comparative Explanatory Assessment
A11.2 defines the Physics of Virtue.
- Theist Unification (Logos Model): Goodness is Systemic Alignment. To be “Good” is to be in sync with the Source. This explains the “Fruits of the Spirit” (Love, Joy, Peace) as the internal sensations of a highly coherent state.
- Structural Realism (Brute Flourishing): Some states are “Better” than others because they are more stable. Evolution selected us to like stability.
- Instrumentalism (Useful Labels): “Good” and “Evil” are just tools for social control. (Cost: This view cannot explain why individuals will die for a “Good” that offers them no personal utility).
Synthesis: A11.2 is the Axiom of the Bridge. It proves that “Morality” is the way conscious beings navigate the Coherence Gradient of the universe. Theophysics proposes that the “Moral Life” is simply the life lived in accordance with the Topological Requirements of the Logos.
Collapse Analysis
If [[089_A11.2_Coherence-Morality-Identity.md) fails:
- Morality becomes a purely psychological or social phenomenon.
- The “Second Law of Moral Thermodynamics” (Sin) has no physical basis.
- The argument that “God is Love” becomes a metaphor rather than a structural statement about the ground of reality.
Coherence as Physical Quantity
Definition:
Interpretation:
- |χ|² = amplitude of the Logos field
- f(∇χ) = function of gradient (measures alignment)
- Integration over spacetime gives total coherence
High coherence: χ is strong and aligned across regions. Low coherence: χ is weak or chaotically varying.
Entropy and Moral Thermodynamics
Physical entropy: S = k_B ln W (Boltzmann)
Moral entropy: Disorder in the χ-field. High moral entropy = low coherence.
Negentropy = Coherence: C = S_max - S.
Second Law analog: In closed moral systems, coherence decreases. Grace (external input) is required for coherence increase.
Good as Negentropic
Good actions: Decrease local entropy (increase order).
Examples:
- Honesty: Increases information coherence (no false signals)
- Justice: Increases social coherence (stable equilibria)
- Love: Increases relational coherence (mutual reinforcement)
- Creativity: Increases meaningful pattern (low K)
All virtues are negentropic operations.
Evil as Entropic
Evil actions: Increase local entropy (increase disorder).
Examples:
- Lying: Decreases information coherence (corrupts signal)
- Injustice: Decreases social coherence (unstable, conflict-generating)
- Hate: Decreases relational coherence (mutual destruction)
- Destruction: Increases meaningless chaos (high K)
All vices are entropic operations.
Connection to χ-Field
The χ-field has a coherence gradient:
- Logos (center) = maximum coherence
- Moving away from Logos = decreasing coherence
Moral compass: The χ-gradient gives direction. “Good” = moving toward higher χ coherence. “Evil” = moving away.
This makes moral direction as physical as gravitational direction.
Mathematical Layer
Coherence Measure
Definition: C: Configurations → ℝ⁺
Properties:
- C(Logos) = max (terminal object has maximal coherence)
- C(chaos) = 0 (pure disorder has zero coherence)
- C is additive: C(A ∪ B) ≤ C(A) + C(B) with equality for independent parts
Kolmogorov Morality
Kolmogorov complexity K(x): Length of shortest program that outputs x.
Moral K: K_moral(action) = complexity of describing the action’s pattern.
Good actions: Low K_moral (simple, elegant, meaningful) Evil actions: High K_moral (chaotic, arbitrary, meaningless)
The Logos compresses: The χ-field is the compression algorithm. Alignment with Logos = low K = goodness.
Game-Theoretic Coherence
Equilibrium coherence: In repeated games, cooperation emerges as equilibrium.
Coherent strategies: Those that sustain equilibrium (tit-for-tat, forgiveness). Incoherent strategies: Those that destroy equilibrium (always defect).
Moral rules encode equilibria: The Ten Commandments, Golden Rule, etc., are descriptions of stable social configurations.
Category-Theoretic Ethics
The moral category:
- Objects: States of affairs
- Morphisms: Actions
- Composition: Sequential actions
The terminal object: The Logos (maximal coherence).
Good morphisms: Those that move toward terminal object. Evil morphisms: Those that move away from terminal object.
Functorial goodness: A functor F: Actions → Values where F(a) = ΔC (change in coherence from action a).
Fixed Points
Moral attractors:
- σ = +1 attractor: Theosis (maximum finite coherence)
- σ = -1 attractor: Damnation (minimum coherence / maximum entropy)
Actions move you toward an attractor. Good actions → +1 attractor. Evil actions → -1 attractor.
The Identity Proof
Claim: Good ≡ Coherence-increasing (not just correlation).
Argument:
- Every paradigm case of good (honesty, justice, love, creativity) increases coherence
- Every paradigm case of evil (lying, injustice, hate, destruction) decreases coherence
- No counterexamples exist (apparent ones dissolve on analysis)
- The correlation is exceptionless and explanatory
- Exceptionless explanatory correlation = identity (Fregean criterion)
- Therefore: Good ≡ Coherence-increasing
This is how we discovered that water ≡ H₂O—by exceptionless correlation that explained all the data.
Source Material
01_Axioms/_sources/Theophysics_Axiom_Spine_Master.xlsx(sheets explained in dump)01_Axioms/AXIOM_AGGREGATION_DUMP.md
Quick Navigation
Category: Sin_Problem/|Sin Problem
Depends On:
- [Sin Problem](./088_A11.1_Moral-Realism]]
Enables:
Related Categories:
- [Sin_Problem/.md)