LN3.1 — Meaningful Configuration Necessity
Chain Position: 26 of 188
Assumes
- [coherence measure](./025_T3.1_Coherence-Cannot-Self-Increase]]
Formal Statement
** Without [[017_A3.2_Coherence-Measure.md), no distinction between meaningful and meaningless configurations.
Enables
- [Information Theory](./027_A4.1_Parsimony]]
Defeat Conditions
- Demonstrate that “Without coherence measure, no distinction meaningful/meaningless” is false, inconsistent, or inapplicable to the claimed domain.
- Reject one of the upstream assumptions (025_T3.1_Coherence-Cannot-Self-Increase) to collapse this axiom.
Standard Objections
- Objection: “Without coherence measure, no distinction meaningful/meaningless” is just a re-labeling of the status quo without new grounding.
- Response: Each dependency 025_T3.1_Coherence-Cannot-Self-Increase is already defended, so rejecting them would collapse the shared foundation.
Defense Summary
- Without coherence measure, no distinction meaningful/meaningless
- Built on: 025_T3.1_Coherence-Cannot-Self-Increase.
- Enables: 027_A4.1_Parsimony.
Collapse Analysis
- Breaks downstream: 027_A4.1_Parsimony
Source Material
01_Axioms/_sources/Theophysics_Axiom_Spine_Master.xlsx(sheets explained in dump)01_Axioms/AXIOM_AGGREGATION_DUMP.md
Quick Navigation
Depends On:
Enables:
Related Categories:
- [Information_Theory/.md)
- [_WORKING_PAPERS/Sin_Problem/|Sin Problem