The 188 Axioms of Theophysics

AXIOM_EVIDENCE_MAP

5 min read

THEOPHYSICS AXIOM-EVIDENCE MAP

Top-Down Deductive Structure

Purpose: This document traces how foundational axioms derive claims, which are validated by evidence bundles. This proves the framework is deductively complete - not assembled from observations, but derived from first principles.

Central Thesis: Entropy ↑ as Coherence ↓

ARCHITECTURE OVERVIEW

LAYER 1: AXIOMS (Logical Primitives)
    ↓ derives
LAYER 2: CLAIMS (Derived Propositions)
    ↓ validated by
LAYER 3: EVIDENCE BUNDLES (Empirical Data)
    ↓ manifests in
LAYER 4: DOMAIN APPLICATIONS (Observable Patterns)

AXIOM REGISTRY

Ontological Axioms (O-Series)

IDAxiomStatementSource
O1.3Conservation of InformationInformation cannot be created or destroyedTHEO_01
O4.4Volitional PolarityWill operates in binary (toward/away from Logos)SOCI_01

Physics/Thermodynamics Axioms (P-Series)

IDAxiomStatementSource
P0.3Information PrimacyReality is fundamentally informationalLOG_01
SN.2Anti-CoherenceEntropy increase is default stateSOCI_01
SN.3Entropy IncreaseClosed systems → disorderSOCI_02, THEO_03

Grace/Intervention Axioms (GR-Series)

IDAxiomStatementSource
GR.1External GraceOrder requires external operatorSOCI_02, THEO_03
GR.3Sign FlipGrace reverses entropy directionTHEO_02

Trinitarian Axioms (T-Series)

IDAxiomStatementSource
TI.1One GodUnified source of all realityLOG_02
TI.2PerichoresisMutual indwelling of PersonsLOG_02
T1.1Son Is LogosChrist = rational principle of cosmosLOG_02

Divine Attribute Axioms (G-Series)

IDAxiomStatementSource
G1.1OmniscienceInfinite Mind holds all truthLOG_01

Human Nature Axioms (H-Series)

IDAxiomStatementSource
HS.5Survives DeathInformation pattern persistsTHEO_01
HM.3Sign ConservationMoral direction conservedSOCI_02

CLAIM DERIVATIONS

From P0.3 (Information Primacy) + G1.1 (Omniscience)

Claim IDClaimDerivation Logic
Math_Requires_Mind”Truth cannot exist in a void”If information is primary, and information requires mind, then truth requires mind

Evidence Required:

  • Mathematical necessity arguments
  • Failure of materialist/Platonist alternatives

From TI.1 + TI.2 + T1.1 (Trinitarian Axioms)

Claim IDClaimDerivation Logic
Generative_Grammar”Trinity generates numbers”Unity (1) + Distinction (2) + Relation (3) = mathematical foundation

Evidence Required:

  • Logical necessity of relation for counting
  • Failure of monist alternatives

From SN.3 (Entropy Increase) + GR.1 (External Grace)

Claim IDClaimDerivation Logic
Self_Help_Impossible”Closed systems cannot self-correct”2nd Law of Thermodynamics applied to social systems

Evidence Required:

  • Historical data on reform movements
  • Comparison of internal vs. external interventions

From O4.4 (Volitional Polarity) + SN.2 (Anti-Coherence)

Claim IDClaimDerivation Logic
Moral_BIOS”Morality is pre-installed”If will has binary polarity, discrimination is built-in

Evidence Required:

  • Infant_Studies: “Fairness detection in pre-verbal infants”

From Conservation Axioms → Economic Claims

Claim IDClaimDerivation Logic
Money_Not_Wealth”Money is not wealth”Energy conservation: paper ≠ work
Nixon_Shock”Dollar-Gold link severed”Historical event
Inflation_Waste_Heat”Inflation is Thermodynamic Waste Heat”Energy printed without work = entropy

Evidence Bundles:

  • Equation of Energy Conservation
  • Historical context of Nixon Shock
  • Economic comparison 1970 vs 2025

From Entropy/Coherence Axioms → Social Claims

Claim IDClaimDerivation Logic
Great_Decoupling_Entropy”Great Decoupling led to increased Entropy”Constraint removal → disorder
Social_Gravity_Collapse”Social Gravity collapsed after prioritizing Self”Closed system = entropy increase
Truth_Subjective_1968”Truth became subjective after 1968”Logos rejection = signal degradation
Identity_Fluid”Identity has become fluid and chosen”Self-definition apart from Logos

Evidence Bundles:

  • Social Coherence Index data
  • Signal-to-Noise Ratio data
  • Monetary Entropy Index data
  • Self-Definition Index data

EVIDENCE BUNDLE REGISTRY

Historical/Empirical Evidence

Bundle IDDescriptionValidates
Historical_DataNewton/Maxwell vs. QM/CosmologyFragmentation thesis
Infant_StudiesFairness detection in pre-verbal infantsMoral_BIOS
Nixon_Shock_ContextHistorical context of 1971Economic claims
Economic_Comparison1970 vs 2025 conditionsInflation thesis

Quantitative Evidence

Bundle IDDescriptionValidates
Social_Coherence_Indexχ measurements 1900-2025Phase transition thesis
Signal_Noise_RatioSNR measurements over timeInformation degradation
Monetary_Entropy_IndexDollar purchasing powerEconomic entropy
Self_Definition_IndexIdentity autonomy metricsLogos rejection
Energy_Conservation_EquationE = constantConservation axiom

DOMAIN APPLICATION MAPPING

LAYER 4: How Axioms Manifest in Domains

DomainPrimary AxiomsObservable PatternKey Evidence
MORAL DECAYSN.3, GR.1, O4.4χ decline 1960-1973Social Coherence Index
PSYCHOLOGYSN.2, GR.1Anxiety/Depression epidemicMental health statistics
SCIENTIFIC METHODP0.3, G1.1Fragmentation, 12 QM interpretationsHistorical comparison
THEOLOGYTI.1, TI.2, GR.3Grace as negentropyThermodynamic analysis
ECONOMICSConservationInflation = entropyMonetary data
SEMANTIC ENTROPY (NEW)P0.3, T1.1Word meaning collapseDictionary redefinitions
SOMATIC ENTROPY (NEW)SN.3, O4.4Obesity/hormonal declineHealth statistics
EDUCATION (NEW)P0.3, SN.3Signal degradation between generationsLiteracy/competence data

TOP-DOWN DERIVATION CHAINS

Chain 1: Logos → Truth → Society

AXIOM: T1.1 (Son Is Logos)
    ↓ implies
AXIOM: P0.3 (Information Primacy)
    ↓ implies
CLAIM: Reality is rational and ordered
    ↓ violated by
EVENT: 1960s "reality is constructed" adoption
    ↓ results in
EVIDENCE: Signal-to-Noise Ratio collapse
    ↓ manifests as
DOMAIN: Semantic Entropy (words lose meaning)

Chain 2: Grace → Thermodynamics → Social Repair

AXIOM: SN.3 (Entropy Increase)
    ↓ implies
CLAIM: Closed systems cannot self-repair
    ↓ requires
AXIOM: GR.1 (External Grace)
    ↓ validated by
EVIDENCE: Amish Control Group (external constraints work)
    ↓ manifests as
DOMAIN: Moral Decay reversal requires external intervention

Chain 3: Conservation → Money → Corruption

AXIOM: O1.3 (Conservation of Information/Energy)
    ↓ implies
CLAIM: Money must represent work
    ↓ violated by
EVENT: Nixon Shock 1971 (fiat currency)
    ↓ results in
EVIDENCE: Purchasing power collapse, debt explosion
    ↓ manifests as
DOMAIN: Economic entropy, wealth inequality

Chain 4: Moral BIOS → Psychology → Crisis

AXIOM: O4.4 (Volitional Polarity)
    ↓ implies
CLAIM: Moral discrimination is hardware (BIOS)
    ↓ validated by
EVIDENCE: Infant fairness detection studies
    ↓ violated by
EVENT: "All values are equal" cultural adoption
    ↓ results in
EVIDENCE: Cognitive dissonance, anxiety epidemic
    ↓ manifests as
DOMAIN: Psychology Crisis

FALSIFICATION CONDITIONS

The framework would be falsified if:

ConditionWould Disprove
Coherence increases without external interventionGR.1 (External Grace required)
Closed systems spontaneously orderSN.3 (Entropy Increase)
Morality is learned, not innateO4.4 (Volitional Polarity)
Amish show same decline as mainstreamControl group validity
1968-1973 markers don’t correlatePhase transition thesis
Math truth is culture-dependentP0.3, G1.1

Current Status: None of these falsifiers have occurred.

NEXT STEPS

Evidence Gaps to Fill

DomainMissing EvidencePriority
Semantic EntropyGoogle Ngram data, dictionary redefinition ratesHIGH
Somatic EntropyObesity timeline, testosterone decline, microplasticsHIGH
EducationGrade inflation data, literacy depth, civics knowledgeHIGH
PsychologyNeural pathway correlations to 3 pathsMEDIUM
EconomicsFull Cantillon Effect quantificationMEDIUM

Axioms Needing Strengthening

AxiomCurrent SupportNeeded
P0.3 (Information Primacy)Logical argumentPhysics citations
GR.1 (External Grace)Theological + AmishMore control groups
SN.3 (Entropy Increase)ThermodynamicsSocial science citations

CANONICAL PAPER

For the full argument on why this top-down structure is unprecedented, see:

PAPER_The_Only_Top_Down_Framework — The Only Top-Down Framework: Why Theophysics Is the First Deductively Complete Theory of Social Collapse

CONCLUSION

This map demonstrates that Theophysics is deductively structured:

  1. Axioms are logically prior (Layer 1)
  2. Claims derive necessarily from axioms (Layer 2)
  3. Evidence validates claims empirically (Layer 3)
  4. Domains are applications, not foundations (Layer 4)

The framework is not bottom-up (data → theory). It is top-down (axioms → predictions → confirmation).

This is the structure of mature science: Einstein derived relativity from axioms, then sought evidence. Theophysics follows the same pattern.

“In the beginning was the Logos” - John 1:1

This isn’t theology imposed on physics. This is physics confirming theology.

Graph View